Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06329440

Comparison of Supraclavicular and Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks in Adult Patients

Comparison of Diaphragma Thickness and Perfusion Index Change in Supraclavicular and Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (actual)
Sponsor
Istanbul University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Hemidiaphragmatic paresis is a common side effect of brachial plexus blocks such as supraclavicular or infraclavicular block techniques. It has been shown that diaphragma thickness is affected at some extent in supraclavicular block and also in costoclavicular block which is accepted as an infraclavicular approach. However, these two approaches have not been extensively investigated before in terms of the diaphragmatic paresis. Here, it is aimed to compare these two methods considering their effects on diaphragma thickness in inspirium and in expirium. Moreover, the performance properties such as motor and sensory block onset, needle visualization time, needle visualization difficulty, postoperative pain scores, and lastly the perfusion index which is known to be reflecting vasodilation will be investigated.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTUltrasonographic measurement of diaphragm thicknessLineer probe of the ultrasound machine will be placed sagitally on the level of 9th to 11th rib in order to observe diaphragmatic thickness change during a sniff. The thicknesses will be measured both in full expiration (Te) and full inspirium (Ti) in centimeters. The diaphragm thickness fraction will be calculated as follows: (Ti-Te)/Te

Timeline

Start date
2024-04-01
Primary completion
2024-11-20
Completion
2024-11-21
First posted
2024-03-26
Last updated
2024-11-25

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06329440. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.