NCT06278753

Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy

Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy Used to Evaluate Lower Urinary Tract Damage After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 540 (actual)
• Sponsor: Tepecik Training and Research Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 90 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.

Detailed description

It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.

Conditions

• Bladder Injury
• Ureter Injury
• Surgical Injury
• Complication of Surgical Procedure

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	carbon dioxide cystoscopy	Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-07-01
• Primary completion: 2024-01-01
• Completion: 2024-04-01
• First posted: 2024-02-26
• Last updated: 2025-02-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)