NCT06276218

Efficacy of Self - Adjustable Clavicular Brace Versus Standard Clavicular Brace for Treatment of Mid Shaft Clavicle Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Study

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 68 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Prince of Songkla University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 75 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

A randomized control trial was conducted to compare the outcomes of conservative management for closed midshaft clavicular fractures using self-adjustable clavicular brace and standard clavicular brace.

Detailed description

Ten patients aged 18-75 years with midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled in the study during February 2022 to February 2023. 6 patients were managed with standard clavicular brace and 4 patients with self-adjustable clavicular brace. All patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Results were assessed based on clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes using the DASH questionnaire, pain, measured by VAS, analgesic usage, displacement, shortening, time to union, and patient satisfaction,

Conditions

• Clavicle Fracture

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Clavicular brace	Clavicular brace for conservative treatment of closed midshaft clavicular fractures

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-02-01
• Primary completion: 2024-02-15
• Completion: 2024-02-16
• First posted: 2024-02-23
• Last updated: 2024-02-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Thailand