Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06265441

Comparison of Pain Relief Post Knee Arthroscopy Using IPACK + Adductor Canal Block Vs. Adductor Canal Block Alone

Comparison of IPACK Block with Adductor Canal Block Vs Adductor Canal Block Alone for Post Operative Analgesia Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40 (actual)
Sponsor
Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
21 Years – 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In this study, the invistigators aim to compare postoperative analgesia effectiveness between combined interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee block (IPACK) and Adductor canal block vs. Adductor canal block alone after Arthroscopic knee surgeries.

Detailed description

Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study will be randomly divided into two groups using their computer-generated random numbers such that even numbers will be enrolled in group A for Adductor canal block alone and odd numbers will be enrolled in group B for Adductor canal block and IPACK block.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREGroup A will receive adductor canal block after spinal anesthesia under a high-frequency ultrasound guidance in which the adductor canal is identified and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injectedThe patients in group A will receive adductor canal block after spinal anesthesia under a high-frequency ultrasound guidance (SonoSite™, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA) in which the patients are placed in the supine position with the arms resting comfortably across the chest and the affected lower extremity is externally rotated. Adductor canal was identified beneath the sartorius muscle and 22-gauge 90-mm spinal needle is inserted from anterolateral to posteromedial direction at a point approximately at the junction between the middle and distal third of the thigh on the anteromedial femur, this location is called mid adductor canal, then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected in the canal
PROCEDUREGroup B will receive adductor canal block under ultrasound guide 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% and IPACK block under direct visualization of ultrasound of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%The patients in Group B will receive adductor canal block as described in group A then IPACK block, in which the patients are placed in a supine position and knee is placed in position of 90° flexion. A low-frequency ultrasound probe is positioned in the popliteal crease 1 finger breadth above the patella, and a spinal needle is inserted from the medial aspect of the knee from anteromedial to posterolateral direction in a plane between the popliteal artery and the femur. The tip of the needle is placed 1-2 cm beyond the lateral edge of the artery, and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected while the needle is being withdrawn after negative aspiration.

Timeline

Start date
2024-05-01
Primary completion
2024-09-01
Completion
2024-10-01
First posted
2024-02-20
Last updated
2024-11-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06265441. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.