Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT06262802
Volumetric Changes in Large Cystic Lesions Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis vs Passive Decompression
In Patients With Large Cystic Lesion Does Volume Reduction Occurs Faster by Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis Than Using Passive Decompression
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 10 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Radwa Hydar Ragab · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 12 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Null hypothesis active decompression and distraction sugosteogenesis is not faster than passive decompression in volume reduction of large cystic lesions
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Active decompression | Intracystic active negative pressure |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2024-09-01
- Completion
- 2025-03-01
- First posted
- 2024-02-16
- Last updated
- 2024-02-16
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06262802. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.