Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06245044

Preventing Medication Dispensing Errors in Pharmacy Practice With Interpretable Machine Intelligence

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Michigan · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Pharmacists currently perform an independent double-check to identify drug-selection errors before they can reach the patient. However, the use of machine intelligence (MI) to support this cognitive decision-making work by pharmacists does not exist in practice. This research is being conducted to examine the effectiveness of the timing of machine intelligence (MI) advice on to determine if it results in lower task time, increased accuracy, and increased trust in the MI.

Detailed description

Pharmacists currently perform an independent double-check currently to identify drug-selection errors before they can reach the patient. However, the use of machine intelligence (MI) to support this cognitive decision-making work by pharmacists does not exist in practice. Instead, pharmacists rely solely on reference images of the medication which they can compare to the prescription vial contents. Previous research has shown that decision support systems can effectively improve healthcare delivery efficiency and accuracy, while preventing adverse drug events. However, little is known about how MI technologies impact pharmacists' work performance and cognitive demand. To facilitate the long-term symbiotic relationship between the pharmacists and the MI system, proper trust needs to be established. While trust has been identified as the central factor for effective human-machine teaming, issues arise when humans place unjustified trust in automated technologies do not place enough trust in them. Over trust in automation can lead to complacency and automation bias. For instance, the pharmacists may rely on the MI system to the extent that they blindly accept any recommendation by the system. Under trust can result in pharmacist disuse and potential abandonment of the MI system. Furthermore, little is known about the timing of the MI advice on pharmacists' work performance. For example, showing the MI's advice while the pharmacist is performing the medication verification task may yield different results than showing the MI's advice after the pharmacist made their decision. The study investigators have developed a MI system for medication images classification. The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the timing of MI advice to determine if it results in lower task time, increased accuracy, and increased trust in the MI.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
BEHAVIORALNo MI HelpParticipants will complete the medication verification task without any MI help
BEHAVIORALScenario #1Participants will receive MI in the form of a pop-up message if their decision differs from the MI's determination.
BEHAVIORALScenario #2MI help will be displayed concurrently with the filled and reference images.

Timeline

Start date
2024-04-11
Primary completion
2024-12-04
Completion
2024-12-04
First posted
2024-02-07
Last updated
2025-11-26
Results posted
2025-11-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06245044. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.