Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06241716

Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia Via a Paramedian Approach in Elderly Patients: a Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96 (estimated)
Sponsor
Tongji Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-assisted localization and real-time ultrasound-guided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia via paramedian approach in elderly patients

Detailed description

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-assisted localization and real-time ultrasound-guided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia via paramedian approach in elderly patients

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREUltrasound-assisted localization, US-ASIn the US-AS group, ultrasonic prescan to determine the best intervertebral space, best puncture Angle and best puncture depth. The optimal puncture section considered by the operator was selected to record the best gap, puncture Angle and depth.
PROCEDUREReal-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTGIn the US-RTG group, the optimal puncture section considered by the operator was selected and recorded directly in the plane of the paracentral transverse section, out of the plane of the paracentral sagittal section or in the plane of the paracentral sagittal section for real-time ultrasound guided lumbar epidural anesthesia.

Timeline

Start date
2024-02-20
Primary completion
2025-10-20
Completion
2026-01-20
First posted
2024-02-05
Last updated
2025-02-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06241716. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.