NCT06240858

Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair

Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 130 (actual)
• Sponsor: Second Hospital of Jilin University · Academic / Other
• Sex: Male
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this prospective study is to compare the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair, in order to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia treatment. The main question it aims to answer is, in which procedure is the self-gripping mesh more effective. Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes. Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.

Conditions

• Inguinal Hernia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.	The TAPP group used self-gripping mesh for laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair.
PROCEDURE	Lichtenstein hernia repair.	The Lichtenstein group used self-gripping mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-03-01
• Primary completion: 2023-11-30
• Completion: 2023-11-30
• First posted: 2024-02-05
• Last updated: 2024-02-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China