NCT06234566

Effect of Different Drilling Techniques on Primary Stability and Marginal Bone Loss of Extra Short Implants

The Effect of Low Speed Drilling Without Irrigation Versus Conventional Drilling With Irrigation in Extra Short Implants on Primary Stability and Marginal Bone Loss

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 30 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Erzincan University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 60 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Our aim in this study is to compare the effects of low-speed drilling surgery technique without irrigation and conventional implant surgery technique with irrigation on extra short implants. The criteria to be taken into consideration when investigating the effect of these techniques on implants are as follows: evaluation of osseointegration at the end of three months, evaluation of marginal bone loss at the end of three months, initial insertion torque values (maximum insertion torque and final insertion torque), ISQ values obtained with a radiofrequency analyzer (Osstel) at the beginning and at the end of three months.

Conditions

• Different Surgical Techniques in Dental Implant Surgery

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Conventional dental implant surgery	It is performed to reconstruct lost teeth. These are surgical procedures performed to place dental implants in the jaw bones. To prepare the implant socket, drilling is performed with serum irrigation at a speed of 800 rpm.
PROCEDURE	Low Speed Drilling Without Irrigation	It is performed to reconstruct lost teeth. These are surgical procedures performed to place dental implants in the jaw bones. To prepare the implant socket, drilling is performed at a speed of 50 rpm without serum irrigation.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-03-01
• Primary completion: 2024-07-15
• Completion: 2024-12-27
• First posted: 2024-01-31
• Last updated: 2024-01-31