NCT06225557

Comparison of Outcome Between (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods in Elective CS

Comparison of Outcome Between the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section Protocol (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 106 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Minia University · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 40 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The study is designed to evaluate the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol during elective cesarean section on patient's outcome measures.

Detailed description

The study is designed to evaluate the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol during elective cesarean section on patient outcome measures. The primary outcome is the evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 11 score (ObsQoR-11) at the time of discharge. Secondary outcomes are the evaluation of peak numeric postoperative pain rating score within the postoperative hospital stay, total amount of postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea, and vomiting impact score after 6 hours postoperatively and at time of discharge, patient satisfaction using Leiden perioperative care patient satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq) at time of discharge, presence of post-cesarean ileus and Hospital length to achieve criteria for discharge.

Conditions

• ERAS

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	ERAS community recommendation	Enhanced recovery techniques including opioid sparing anesthesia in elective cesarean section
OTHER	Traditional postoperative care	Usual anesthesia and analgesia in elective cesarean section.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-03-10
• Primary completion: 2024-05-30
• Completion: 2024-06-30
• First posted: 2024-01-26
• Last updated: 2024-03-05