Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06213116
Comparing the Efficacy Between Lignocaine Given Via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray
Comparing the Efficacy Between Lignocaine Given Via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray Pre Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Undergoing General Anesthesia.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 125 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Universiti Sains Malaysia · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Comparing the efficacy between Lignocaine given via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray pre endotracheal intubation in adult undergoing General Anesthesia.
Detailed description
Comparing the efficacy of Lignocaine given via 2 device (Lignocaine Spray and MADGIC Atomizer) on hemodinamic parameters postintubations and severity grading of post operative sore throat, cough and hoarseness of voice.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | MADgic Atomizer | Device to deliver directly lignocaine |
| DEVICE | Lignocaine pump spray | Lignocaine 30 mg (3 puffs) given via 10mg Lignocaine Pump Spray prior to endotracheal intubation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2021-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-05-01
- Completion
- 2023-07-01
- First posted
- 2024-01-19
- Last updated
- 2024-05-21
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Malaysia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06213116. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.