Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT06212102
Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation
Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Bedaya Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 35 Years – 44 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using progestin with GnRH antagonist to prevent premature LH surge in poor responders undergoing double stimulation protocol.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Progestin primed ovarian stimulation | HMG ( 300IU) was used during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (FPS) and during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation (LPS). Progestin (dydrogesterone) 30 mg/day was used to prevent premature LH surge during the FPS and LPS. |
| DRUG | GnRH antagonist | HMG ( 300IU) was used during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (FPS) and during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation (LPS). Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (Cetrorelix acetate) (0.2 mg) was used to prevent premature LH surge during the FPS and LPS. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-03-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
- First posted
- 2024-01-18
- Last updated
- 2024-01-23
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06212102. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.