Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT06212102

Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation

Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120 (estimated)
Sponsor
Bedaya Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
35 Years – 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using progestin with GnRH antagonist to prevent premature LH surge in poor responders undergoing double stimulation protocol.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGProgestin primed ovarian stimulationHMG ( 300IU) was used during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (FPS) and during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation (LPS). Progestin (dydrogesterone) 30 mg/day was used to prevent premature LH surge during the FPS and LPS.
DRUGGnRH antagonistHMG ( 300IU) was used during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (FPS) and during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation (LPS). Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (Cetrorelix acetate) (0.2 mg) was used to prevent premature LH surge during the FPS and LPS.

Timeline

Start date
2024-02-01
Primary completion
2026-03-01
Completion
2026-12-01
First posted
2024-01-18
Last updated
2024-01-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06212102. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.