NCT06146244

Comparison of ISQ in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Regenerated Bone

Comparison Between Value of Resonance Frequency Analysis (ISQ) in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Value Obtained in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Regenerated Bone and Its Evolution After 3 Months

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 132 (actual)
• Sponsor: European University of Madrid · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 23 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Compare ISQ values of implants placed in antral area in native bone vs regenerated bone with a follow-up at 3 months to compare values changes.

Detailed description

The stability of dental implants is influenced by the type of bone in which the implant is placed. Native bone tends to provide better initial stability due to its density and quality, while regenerated bone, it is logical to think that it may present less stability due to the quality of the generated bone and the presence of defects in the treated area. In this study it has been observed that after 3 months more stability is observed in the antral area, measured in ISQ resonance frequency in implants on regenerated bone, which surprises us and this result is explained in detail in said study.

Conditions

• Implant Site Reaction

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	sinus lift	Implant placement on grafted sinus vs antral autogenous bone
DEVICE	resonance frequency analysis	analysis of the ISQ evolution and its changes after 3 months of placing the implant in native or regenerated bone, always in the antral area

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-03-01
• Primary completion: 2019-03-01
• Completion: 2019-09-01
• First posted: 2023-11-24
• Last updated: 2023-11-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Spain

Regulatory

• FDA-regulated device study