NCT06128590

Photobiomodulation for Controlling Pre-Local Anesthetic Injection Pain

Photobiomodulation for Controlling Pre-Local Anesthetic Injection Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (actual)
• Sponsor: University of Nove de Julho · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 60 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The objective of this study is to assess whether pre-anesthetic photobiomodulation (PBM) can effectively reduce needle puncture pain and enhance the efficiency of local anesthesia. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 50 participants were included. The control group underwent the standard anesthetic procedure, while the experimental group received the application of an infrared laser (100mW at 808nm, 8J at a single point) immediately before anesthesia, at the site of the intended needle puncture. Both groups underwent the same anesthetic procedure, administered by the same operator. The outcome evaluator and the patient were blind to the FBM application. The primary outcome of the study focused on pain experienced at the time of needle insertion, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the needle's introduction. Secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety levels, measured using the Beck questionnaire, anesthetic onset time determined through the electric pulp test, the number of anesthetics required for the procedure, and the necessity for supplementary anesthesia.

Detailed description

Dental fear and phobia are widespread worldwide, with local anesthesia being one of the procedures that patients fear the most. To alleviate the pain associated with needle insertion and the need for repeat procedures, various complementary therapies have been introduced. However, to date, there is no established protocol for this intervention. The objective of this study is to assess whether pre-anesthetic photobiomodulation (PBM) can effectively reduce needle puncture pain and enhance the efficiency of local anesthesia. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 50 participants were included. The control group underwent the standard anesthetic procedure, while the experimental group received the application of an infrared laser (100mW at 808nm, 8J at a single point) immediately before anesthesia, at the site of the intended needle puncture. Both groups underwent the same anesthetic procedure, administered by the same operator. The outcome evaluator and the patient were blind to the FBM application. The primary outcome of the study focused on pain experienced at the time of needle insertion, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the needle's introduction. Secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety levels, measured using the Beck questionnaire, anesthetic onset time determined through the electric pulp test, the number of anesthetics required for the procedure, and the necessity for supplementary anesthesia. Categorical variables will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies and compared using the Pearson chi-squared test, likelihood ratio test, or Fisher's exact test. Quantitative variables will be assessed for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Outcome variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Variables measured under multiple conditions will be compared using analysis of variance for repeated measures. A significance level of P \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Conditions

• Fear Needles

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Photobiomodulation	Photobiomodulation was applied before the procedures at an infrared wavelength of 808nm, at a power of 100mW, 1 point with a total energy of 8J, time of 80s, irradiance of 3.33W/cm² and radiant exposure of 266.66 J/cm2. The application point was on the retromolar region where the needle was inserted to perform the anesthetic, in a single application before the procedure. The patient and operator were properly protected with goggles in both the control and experimental groups.
DRUG	Mepivacaine hydrochloride in combination with epinephrine	The anesthetic of choice will be Mepivacaine, which is widely used in dentistry with duration between 1.5 and 2 minutes. The maximum recommended dose is 6.6 mg/Kg, not exceeding 400 mg or 11 anesthetic tubes. It is a sterile injectable solution of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL) in combination with epinephrine 1:100,000 (0.01 mg/mL). Each vial contains 1.8 mL, 36 mg of mepivacaine hydrochloride, and 0.018 mg of epinephrine. All patients will use anesthetics from the same brand (DLA Pharmaceutical LTDA), one of the most widely used on the market. All patients will be anesthetized with tubes from the same batch, one tube per procedure.
DEVICE	Photobiomodulation simulation	The participants will be treated in the same manner as in group A. The person responsible for the application of FBM will simulate the irradiations by placing the device in the same location described for the experimental group, but the equipment will remain turned off. To prevent the participant from identifying their group, the activation sounds of the devices (beeps) will be recorded to simulate the device's operation.

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-02-15
• Primary completion: 2024-02-20
• Completion: 2024-02-20
• First posted: 2023-11-13
• Last updated: 2024-07-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Brazil