Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06121141

Comparison of Two Different Concentrations of Local Anesthetic in Patient Reported Pain in Oculoplastic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30 (actual)
Sponsor
Timothy Ekhlassi · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare pain scores in people undergoing upper eyelid surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is one concentration of local anesthetic (also called numbing or freezing injection) less painful when it is injected? * Does one concentration of local anesthetic provide better pain control during surgery? Participants will have two different concentrations of local anesthetic injected into the upper eyelid skin prior to surgery, and will be asked to rate the pain they have during the injection. At the end of surgery, they will be asked to rate the pain they have during surgery. Researchers will compare the pain scores to see if one of the concentrations is less painful during the injection and to see if one of the concentrations provides better pain control during surgery.

Detailed description

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the level of pain experienced during injection of dilute local anesthetic when compared to non-dilute local anesthetic for oculoplastic surgery. It will also evaluate the level of pain experienced during surgery when comparing dilute local anesthetic to non-dilute local anesthetic for oculoplastic surgery. Study design: Randomized, double-blind study of 30 patients undergoing elective bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty, for a total of 60 eyes having surgery. For each patient, one side will be injected using the control medication consisting of non-dilute 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000, and the other side will be injected using the treatment medication consisting of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 diluted with normal saline (09.% NaCl) in a 1:4 ratio with normal saline (1 cc of anesthetic to 4 cc of normal saline). The distribution of which eyelid (right versus left) receives each arm will be randomized and hidden from both the researcher and the patient. Identical syringes and hypodermic needles will be used for the treatment and control arms. Each patient will then be asked to rate the pain experienced during local anesthetic injection for each side using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). At the end of surgery, each patient will be asked to rate the level of pain experienced during the surgery on each side using a blank version of the same scale. Patients will be followed up for their regular post-operative appointment 7-21 days after surgery. Data (VAS pain scores) will be collected on paper from each patient and entered into an Excel format spreadsheet. The need for additional local anesthetic, as well as the rate of anesthetic infiltration, will also be recorded in this Excel file. All data will be deidentified by assigning each participant an alphanumeric code.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGFull strength lidocaine with epinephrine2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000
DRUGDilute lidocaine with epinephrine2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 diluted with normal saline (09.% NaCl) in a 1:4 ratio

Timeline

Start date
2023-08-07
Primary completion
2024-01-23
Completion
2024-05-27
First posted
2023-11-07
Last updated
2024-09-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06121141. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.