Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06102915

Rocuronium vs Cis-atracurium: Do Rocuronium Still 'ROCKS' In Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
289 (actual)
Sponsor
Institut Jantung Negara · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The current trend in most cardiac surgeries was to use rocuronium as it provides faster recovery in train-of-four ratio compared to other aminosteroid non-depolarising neuromuscular blocker. However, as most cardiac centres' standard of care does not perform any neuromuscular monitoring nor antagonism of neuromuscular blockade effect, residual neuromuscular blockade could potentially be the key to delayed extubation. As such, Cis-atracurium's organ-independent Hofmann elimination could be in favour.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGRocuronium Bromide 10 MG/MLComparative
DRUGNimbex 10 MG in 5 ML InjectionComparative

Timeline

Start date
2023-08-01
Primary completion
2023-11-23
Completion
2023-11-23
First posted
2023-10-26
Last updated
2023-11-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Malaysia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06102915. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Rocuronium vs Cis-atracurium: Do Rocuronium Still 'ROCKS' In Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (NCT06102915) · Clinical Trials Directory