NCT06099834

Evaluation of Osseointegration Process of Dental Implants

Evaluation of Osseointegration Process of Implants With Different Length And Diameter By Different Methods

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 19 (actual)
• Sponsor: Istanbul Medipol University Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 55 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Implant stability is critical to successful osseointegration, the direct structural connection between the dental implant surface and bone. Implant stability must therefore be measured to evaluate implant success. The study evaluated the osseointegration of different sizes with two devices measuring stability with different methods.

Detailed description

The 39 implants, 4.0 and 4.5 mm in diameter and 10 and 12 mm in length, in 19 patients were included. Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were recorded. Stabilities were measured with Periotest and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at day 0 (intra-operative) and the 1st (T1), 4th (T4), and 12th (T12) weeks. Probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) scores were compared between T1 and T4.

Conditions

• Dental Implant Failed
• Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Patients selection	Patient selection were selected according to selected criteria.
OTHER	Implnat placement	dental implants were applied as recommended by the manufacturer.
OTHER	Recall visits	Following the operations, the stability of the dental implants was measured at the 1st (T1), 4th (T4), and 12th (T12) weeks using Periotest (Periotest M, Modautal/Germany) and Osstell (Osstell AB-W\&H, Sweden) devices.

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-09-14
• Primary completion: 2020-11-07
• Completion: 2021-02-11
• First posted: 2023-10-25
• Last updated: 2023-11-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)