NCT06083428

Erector Spinae vs. PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) vs. PENG Block for Pain Management and Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 90 (actual)
• Sponsor: Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 90 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Effect of PENG block and ESPB on pain management, and NLR and PLR following knee arthroplasty

Detailed description

Hip arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, especially in elderly patients, due to the deformation of joints. Patients may complain of severe pain due to surgical trauma and prosthesis. Regional anesthesia methods may be performed to reduce the inflammatory response, opioid consumption, and opioid-related side effects. In recent years, the influence of regional anesthesiology on reducing the inflammatory response after surgical procedures has been emphasized. However, very few studies have evaluated the effect of various methods of anesthesia on the NLR. This is the first study to investigate the effect of regional anesthesia on the NLR and PLR in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

Conditions

• Hip Arthropathy
• Hip Osteoarthritis
• Hip Pain Chronic

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution Erector Spinae Plane Block	ultrasound guided ESPB - L4 level, unilateral
DRUG	Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution - PENG block	ultrasound guided PENG block
DRUG	Control Test	Only spinal anesthesia

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-10-17
• Primary completion: 2024-06-11
• Completion: 2024-06-11
• First posted: 2023-10-16
• Last updated: 2024-06-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Poland