NCT06059105

Immediate Implant Using an Inverted Co-Axis at 12º Versus a Conventional Conical Implant

Immediate Implant Using an Inverted Co-Axis at 12º Versus a Conventional Conical Implant: A Randomised Clinical Trial With 1 Year Follow-up

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 30 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

This study is a randomised controlled clinical trial. The patients will be included for the placement of immediate implants with immediate crown placement, to replace maxillary anterior teeth. Any significant differences between the Co-Axis implant and a conventional conical implant will be evaluated.

Detailed description

Introduction: It is commonly known that the placement of an immediate implant is a technique-sensitive procedure, as the implant should be placed in the palatal aspect for the perfect prosthetic emergence and profile. In order to supply this complexity, there is a novel macroimplant design involving an implant with a 12º angled platform. This angulation of the coronal part of the implant allows perfect emergence of the placement of post-extraction implants, since it is placed at the center of the socket, acquiring the best possible bone. In addition, thanks to the angled neck, prosthetic emergence is ideal, as it is corrected and emerges through the cingulate area, thus securing a perfect emergence profile. Objectives: Primary Outcomes: Evaluate the percentage of success and survival of the Inverted Co-Axis 12º Southern Implants versus the Internal Conical (Deep Tapered Conical) South Implants on a 1-2-1 follow-up. Secondary Outcomes: 1. To evaluate the primary stability of both implant systems through a coefficient stability if implants using the Penguin RFA; 2. To evaluate the horizontal and vertical marginal bone loss via a CBCT, 1 year after implant placement; 3. To evaluate the soft tissues via the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) 1 year post-op. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in 2 groups of 15 patients, conical or inverta co-axis implants. Immediate implants in the aesthetic zone of the superior maxilar were placed with an immediate provisional crown restoration. In the same surgery, a connective tissue graft was performed. Only type I sockets according to the Elian Classification were eligible for this study.

Conditions

• Dental Implant Failed

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Immediate Implant Surgery	Inverted Co-Axis 12º Southern Implants
DEVICE	Immediate Implant Surgery	Internal Conical (Deep Tapered Conical) South Implants

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-03-15
• Primary completion: 2024-09-15
• Completion: 2024-09-15
• First posted: 2023-09-28
• Last updated: 2023-09-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Spain