Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05985408
LVSP Based CRT vs. RVAP Based CRT
Left Ventricular Septal Pacing Based Rescue CRT Versus Right Ventricular Apical Pacing Based CRT for Chronic Heart Failure: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To find out whether left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP)-based cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is superior to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP)-based CRT in patients with failed left bundle branch pacing at the beginning of chronic heart failure.
Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
- Left Ventricular Septal Pacing
- Right Ventricular Septal Pacing
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | left ventricular septal pacing | For left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) failure cases, use left ventricular septal pacing instead of LBBP; others were same as traditional CRT. |
| DEVICE | right ventricular apical pacing | For left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) failure cases, use right ventricular apical pacing instead of LBBP; others were same as traditional CRT. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2025-03-01
- Completion
- 2025-09-01
- First posted
- 2023-08-14
- Last updated
- 2023-08-14
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Regulatory
- FDA-regulated device study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05985408. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.