Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05985031

Reciprocal Inhibition Versus Reciprocal Facilitation In Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Does Reciprocal Inhibition, a Rehabilitation Technique, Convert to Reciprocal Facilitation in Patients With Upper Motor Neuron Lesions?

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10 (actual)
Sponsor
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
25 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Reciprocal inhibition is a medulla spinalis control mechanism that facilitates motor activities in healthy people. As the agonist muscle contracts, the antagonist muscle is inhibited so that the agonist action can take place properly. In the literature, there are studies showing that in patients with upper motor neuron lesions, this reverses, and reciprocal facilitation occurs instead of inhibition. However, there is no clear situation in this regard, there is a need for more methodologically sound studies. Our aim in this study is to investigate the presence of reciprocal facilitation in patients with spinal cord lesions (SCL).

Detailed description

Reciprocal inhibition is a spinal segmental control mechanism that facilitates motor activities in healthy people and is also used in treating spasticity. Considering the current literature, there are some studies claiming that this is reversed in patients with upper motor neuron lesions and that there is reciprocal facilitation instead of inhibition. However, the proposed evidence is not convincing. Our aim in this study was to investigate the presence of reciprocal facilitation in detail in patients with upper motor neuron lesions. This study was conducted in five patients with spinal cord lesions and five healthy individuals. Both the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles of the cases were recorded using surface and multi-motor unit electromyography (EMG) electrodes. To elicit an H reflex in the soleus muscle, an electric current was delivered through the popliteal fossa using the monopolar technique. The Achilles tendon was tapped with the reflex hammer to elicit a T reflex. Since the H-reflex and T-reflex responses were detected in the tibialis anterior muscle surface and multi-motor unit EMG recordings, the findings were evaluated as direct stimulation, cross-talk, and reciprocal facilitation. Methodologically, This research aimed to be a guiding study for future studies.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTendon tapWhile examining the T reflex, the ankle was held passively in neutral, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion positions by the investigator.
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTibial nerve stimulationH-reflex responses were examined by tibial nerve stimulation

Timeline

Start date
2023-01-05
Primary completion
2023-01-17
Completion
2023-08-01
First posted
2023-08-14
Last updated
2023-08-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05985031. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.