NCT05960825

Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations Versus Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin

Assessment of Two Different Modalities of Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations Versus Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin: A Comparative Clinical Study

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: Phase 2
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 18 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Al-Azhar University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 15 Years – 22 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The present clinical comparative study will be undertaken for assessment of two different modalities of maxillary canine retraction assisted with microosteoperforations versus injectable platelet rich fibrin.

Detailed description

Group I: will include 9 patients who willreceive MOPs with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol. ▪ Group II: will include 9 patients receive i-PRF that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.

Conditions

• Effects of; Movement of Teeth Assiste Wit MOPS and I-prf

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
COMBINATION_PRODUCT	injectable platelet rich fibrin versus microosteoperforation	injectable platelet rich fibrin which is second product of blood versus microosteoperforation which is surgical procedure

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-12-01
• Primary completion: 2024-03-01
• Completion: 2024-08-01
• First posted: 2023-07-27
• Last updated: 2023-07-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt