NCT05960292

Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications

Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications of Vaginal Vault in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 56 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Egymedicalpedia · Industry
• Sex: Female
• Age: 40 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Hysterectomy is considered as a common operation in Gynecology. Hysterectomy could be made by vaginally, laparoscopically or abdominally. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologist advises the use of a minimally invasive technique for the sake of women and to decrease hospital stay and costs.

Detailed description

Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is a minimally invasive operation that could be made when vaginal hysterectomy is not accessible due to anatomical problems. Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) is a severe adverse event and occurs more frequently after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. The study shows effects of the laparoscopic approach versus the vaginal route for the management of vaginal cuff closure during total laparoscopic hysterectomy on female sexual function.

Conditions

• Vaginal Vault Prolapse

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Laparoscopic and Vaginal Hysterectomy	To make a comparison between the Vaginal Vault complications after Hysterectomy

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-08-01
• Primary completion: 2024-04-01
• Completion: 2024-04-30
• First posted: 2023-07-25
• Last updated: 2023-09-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt