Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05954962
Efficacy of Micronized Natural Progesterone vs GnRH Antagonist in the Prevention of LH Peak During Ovarian Stimulation.
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Micronized Natural Progesterone (Seidigestan®) vs GnRH Antagonist (Astarté®) in the Prevention of LH Peak During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 150 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Instituto Bernabeu · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 33 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study aims to investigate if the use of oral micronized natural progesterone is not inferior to the use of subcutaneous antagonist in preventing LH peak in controlled ovarian stimulation.
Detailed description
The study will aim to include 150 women (egg donors): 75 per group and the principal variable will be the number of retrieved mature (MII) oocytes. Randomized, prospective, controlled, single center, phase IV study.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Progesterone 200 MG | The patients in the study group will administer oral natural micronized progesterone capsules from day 1 of ovarian stimulation instead of "antagonist" (ganirelix) subcutaneaous injections from day 5-6 of stimulation. |
| DRUG | Ganirelix Acetate | The patients in the control group will administer subcutaneaous injections of ganirelix from day 5-6 of stimulation as per currently used protocol. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-12-23
- Primary completion
- 2025-04-03
- Completion
- 2025-08-30
- First posted
- 2023-07-20
- Last updated
- 2026-03-27
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05954962. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.