Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05913128

Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Versus Tubularized Incised Plate for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Technique Versus Tubularized Incised Plate Technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86 (estimated)
Sponsor
Benha University · Academic / Other
Sex
Male
Age
6 Months – 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

To compare Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Detailed description

Aim of study to compare glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREGlandular Urethral Disassembly techniqueFor Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Timeline

Start date
2023-07-30
Primary completion
2023-11-30
Completion
2023-12-30
First posted
2023-06-22
Last updated
2023-06-22

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05913128. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Versus Tubularized Incised Plate for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair (NCT05913128) · Clinical Trials Directory