NCT05871840

Effectiveness and Safety of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy on Myopia Control Among Children and Adolescents

Real-World Evidence: Effectiveness and Safety of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy on Myopia Control Among Children and Adolescents

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 360 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Shenzhen Hospital (Guangming), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 7 Years – 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Myopia has become one of the leading causes of visual impairment globally and brings a heavy burden on the society. Therefore, preventing and controlling the progression of myopia has become an urgent public health issue that needs to be addressed. The purpose of this study is to provide real-world evidence for identifying the incidence of myopia control (axial length growth rate ≤ 0.1mm/year) after 36-month RLRL therapy, and long-term safety of RLRL therapy in children and adolescents.

Detailed description

The prevalence of myopia in children is increasing worldwide and is viewed as a major public health concern. The current methods for myopia control include medication (e.g., atropine eye drops), optical (e.g., orthokeratology) and environmental interventions (e.g., time outdoors). Nevertheless, these treatments still have limitations. For example, low-concentration atropine may cause systemic side effects and accommodation loss caused by ciliary muscle paralysis. Moreover, the use of orthokeratology in children poses problems such as difficulty wearing, low compliance, and possible complications such as severe corneal infections. Thus, developing the more effective and safe treatment for myopia control in children and adolescents is the future research direction. Recently, repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy has emerged as a treatment for myopia control in children and adolescents, with promising efficacy and safety. It is suggested that continued RLRL therapy sustained promising efficacy and safety in slowing myopia progression within 2 years. However, relevant information on the effectiveness and safety of RLRL therapy on myopia control over 2 years among children and adolescents remain scarce, which deserves to be further explored. In this multicenter observational study, the investigators aim to recruit 360 children aged 7-18 years who have currently accepted RLRL therapy at 3 study centers in China. All participants are randomly selected by stratified sampling based on the treatment duration of RLRL therapy (6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or more). First, the investigators will confirm whether these participants have pre-treatment data (before starting RLRL therapy), including visual acuity, axial length and cycloplegic refraction. Then all the eligible participants who meet the preliminary inclusion criteria, will be invited to come to the corresponding hospitals and further undergo the comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity, measurement of ocular biometric parameters, cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp examination, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), electroretinography (ERG) and questionnaire surveys.

Conditions

• Myopia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Repeated Low-Level Red-Light (RLRL) Therapy	This treatment device was made by Eyerising SuzhouXuanjia Optoelectronics Technology, which has been on the market and used widely for amblyopia treatment for the past decade in China. This device is certified as a class IIa device by the China National Medical Products Administration. It consists of semiconductor laser diodes, which deliver low-level red light with a wavelength of 650 ±10 nm at an illuminance level of approximately 1600 lux through the pupil to the fundus. Based on calculations completed by an independent lab, the light power going through a 4-mm pupil is 0.29 mW and is classified as class 1 under the International Electrotechnical Commission 60825-1:2014 standard, which is at a level considered safe for direct ocular exposure that would not create retinal thermal hazard.

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-06-01
• Primary completion: 2024-06-01
• Completion: 2024-12-01
• First posted: 2023-05-23
• Last updated: 2023-06-22