NCT05861908

Bulk-fill With Different Technique Three-year Clinical Performance

Impact of Placement Techniques on Three-year Clinical Performance of Class II Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations and Laboratory Investigation of Marginal Adaptation

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (actual)
• Sponsor: Mansoura University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 35 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The current study will be intended to evaluate and compare three-year clinical performance of class II bulk-fill resin composite restorations placed with different techniques.

Detailed description

Fifty patients with proximal carious lesion in permanent molars were included in the study. A total eighty class II cavities were restored with one of the following bulk-fill resin composite with their adhesive systems (n=20) Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-aenial™ BULK Injectable or Sonicfill3. Double blinded randomized clinical trial with survival and clinical quality were evaluated at baseline, after 12 , 24 and 36months using modified FDI(Fédération dentaire internationale) World Dental Federation criteria

Conditions

• Bulk-fill Which is Special Type of Resin Composite
• Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration	restoration of class II caries with different bulk-fill technique
OTHER	Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration	restoration of class II caries with different bulk-fill technique
OTHER	G-aenial™ BULK Injectable restoration	restoration of class II caries with different bulk-fill technique
OTHER	Sonicfill3 restoration	restoration of class II caries with different bulk-fill technique

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-05-09
• Primary completion: 2022-05-09
• Completion: 2024-05-09
• First posted: 2023-05-17
• Last updated: 2023-05-17

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt