Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05857514

Randomized Controlled Trial of Rectal Indomethacin Versus Combined Pancreatic Stent Placement and Rectal Indomethacin for Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

A Prospective, Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Rectal Indomethacin Versus Combined Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement and Rectal Indomethacin for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
384 (estimated)
Sponsor
Moti Lal Nehru Medical College · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis. The main question it aims to answer is: whether rectal indomethacin alone is superior to combination of pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis Participants will be patients who give consent to the study and who are required to undergo ERCP as part of their standard care. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare \[rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis.\] to see if \[whether rectal indomethacin alone is superior to combination of pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis\].

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGRectal IndomethacinProphylactic Rectal indomethacin 100mg for prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis
PROCEDUREProphylactic Pancreatic duct stentingProphylactic pancreatic duct stenting with rectal indomethacin 100 mg for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis

Timeline

Start date
2023-05-10
Primary completion
2024-05-01
Completion
2024-05-01
First posted
2023-05-12
Last updated
2023-06-28

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: India

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05857514. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.