Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05832047

Aggressive Hydration With Lactated Ringer's Solution Versus Plasma Solution for the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis

Aggressive Hydration With Lactated Ringer's Solution Versus Plasma Solution for the Prevention of Post ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography) Pancreatitis : Multicenter, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
844 (actual)
Sponsor
Do Hyun Park · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In the existing Aggressive hydration comparison study related to the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), research bias may occur due to the lack of blinding between fluids, so in this study, the investigators will conduct a multicenter randomized comparative study in which the comparative fluids are double-blinded to observe differences between fluids in the preventive effect of pancreatitis that occurs after ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography). A total of 844 patients scheduled for ERCP will be enrolled in this clinical trial and randomly assigned to the lactated Ringer's solution or to the Plasma solution in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients will receive study drug or control drug for up to 24 hours before and after ERCP implementation. In previous comparative studies related to PEP prevention, research bias may have been introduced because of insufficient blinding of the treatment strategies, as well as instances where the evaluating investigator did not perform blinding. We are therefore conducting a multicenter, randomized comparative study double-blinded as to the two types of fluid (lactated Ringer's solution or plasma solution), and in which the endoscopists, outcome assessors and patients are blinded to the randomization allocation.

Detailed description

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which occurs in 2% to 15% of all patients undergoing ERCP and is treated conservatively with fasting and sufficient fluid supply according to the standards of care for general acute pancreatitis, and most patients improve within a few days without major complications. However, high-risk patients are more susceptible to PEP with incidence rates between 15% and 42%, and severe pancreatitis can develop in 11.4% of PEP cases with a 3% mortality rate. Therefore, there are significant unmet needs for PEP patients. In this trial, all patients will receive aggressive hydration involving fluids that are commercially available and widely administered. The trial aims to minimize potential risks and has established routine safety monitoring to protect the participants. In real practice, it is crucial to consider not just the type of fluid utilized, but also the most effective fluid volume for preventing PEP, along with the optimal timing for administering the fluid. Given that a significant number of ERCPs are performed in outpatient settings in the USA and other countries, the current protocol allowing outpatients to occupy recovery areas for extended periods, such as 8 hours post-ERCP, seems challenging to implement in real clinical practice. These considerations highlight the necessity for a re-evaluation of existing guidelines. Therefore, the present reassessment aims, not only to optimize efficiency and patient flow in medical settings but also to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol in preventing PEP considering practical duration of intravenous fluid infusion, such as 4 hours postprocedure.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGPlasma solution (4-hour aggressive hydration)Aggressive hydration : 10 mL/kg injection within 30\~90min before procedure, 3 mL/kg/hr fluid injection during procedure, 10 mL/kg injection within 30\~60min after procedure, fluid, injection at 3 mL/kg/hr for 4 hours.
DRUGLactated Ringer solution (4-hour aggressive hydration)Aggressive hydration : 10 mL/kg injection within 30\~90min before procedure, 3 mL/kg/hr fluid injection during procedure, 10 mL/kg injection within 30\~60min after procedure, fluid, injection at 3 mL/kg/hr for 4 hours.
DRUG8-hour aggressive hydrationIf patients experienced postprocedural abdominal pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS score\>3) or a worsening of abdominal pain compared with the pain before ERCP, the administration of study fluid continues until 8 hours (3 mL/kg/hr ) regardless of the results of serum amylase/lipase within 4 hours after ERCP because serum amylase/lipase within 4 hours after ERCP may have a result approximately 1-2 hours (5 hours-6 hours after ERCP) after blood sampling

Timeline

Start date
2023-06-19
Primary completion
2024-07-25
Completion
2025-01-20
First posted
2023-04-27
Last updated
2025-02-06

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05832047. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.