NCT05825729

Diagnostic Efficacy Of 3 EUS-FNB Techniques

Diagnostic Efficacy Of 3 Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Techniques In Solid Masses: A Randomized Clinical Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 330 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Hospital Universitario Insular Gran Canaria · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a widely recognized tool for over 30 years for diagnosing intra-abdominal lesions and gastrointestinal cancers, especially pancreatic neoplasia. In most hospitals, it is the preferred method for sampling using fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or histology needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNB) to obtain cytological and histological material for an anatomopathological diagnosis. It is also recognized by current oncology guidelines. Numerous factors can affect the efficacy of this technique, such as the needle size, type (cytology or histology), number of passes made on the lesion, the presence or absence of a pathologist in the endoscopy room, the experience of the endoscopist, etc. Currently, EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB are recommended interchangeably for diagnosis; however, it appears that histology needles (EUS-FNB) allow for greater diagnostic efficacy by obtaining a cellular block with fewer passes, which allows for more advanced anatomopathological analysis (such as immunohistochemistry or molecular analysis). Regarding the technique for performing the puncture and acquiring the sample, current European guidelines recommend sampling using EUS-FNA or FNB by dry suction with a 10 mL syringe. However, other recognized techniques, such as using a stylet with the "slow-pull" technique (not positioning for or against) or liquid biopsy (which could obtain larger cellular blocks compared to dry puncture), are widely used and could obtain better samples, but there is no clear consensus currently. Investigators' goal is to conduct a randomized clinical trial of three EUS-FNB techniques (dry puncture vs slow-pull vs wet puncture) used in daily clinical practice to evaluate which of the three techniques has greater efficacy in cytological and pathological diagnosis.

Conditions

• Efficacy, Self

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	Dry suction technique (A)	Using a linear echoendoscope, such as Pentax or Olympus, after identifying the lesion and deciding where to perform the EUS-FNB, always checking that there are no vessels on the eco-Doppler that would prevent puncture, a 22G Cook "Echo-Tip Procore" histology needle will be used to perform the following techniques of the described arms. \- Dry suction puncture: Once the lesion is located and punctured, the stylet will be completely removed, and a 10 mL syringe with a vacuum of 10 mL will be attached. In each pass, the needle will be advanced and retracted 20-30 times according to the standard technique. The suction will then be closed, and the needle will be removed. The "fanning" technique will be performed whenever possible.
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	Slow-pull technique (B)	Using a linear echoendoscope, such as Pentax or Olympus, after identifying the lesion and deciding where to perform the EUS-FNB, always checking that there are no vessels on the eco-Doppler that would prevent puncture, a 22G Cook "Echo-Tip Procore" histology needle will be used to perform the following techniques of the described arms.
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	Wet suction technique (C)	Using a linear echoendoscope, such as Pentax or Olympus, after identifying the lesion and deciding where to perform the EUS-FNB, always checking that there are no vessels on the eco-Doppler that would prevent puncture, a 22G Cook "Echo-Tip Procore" histology needle will be used to perform the following techniques of the described arms. \- Wet suction technique: Prior to puncture, the stylet should be removed and the needle should be flushed with 1-2 ml of physiological saline and a 10 ml vacuum syringe with 3-5 ml of saline should be attached. In each pass, the needle should be moved forward and backward 20-30 times. Aspiration should be opened as the needle advances and closed as it is withdrawn. Afterwards, the aspiration should be closed and the needle should be removed. The "fanning" technique should be performed whenever possible.

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-06-27
• Primary completion: 2025-05-22
• Completion: 2025-05-22
• First posted: 2023-04-24
• Last updated: 2023-11-15

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Spain