NCT05824949

Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling Effect on Implant Stability

The Impact of Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Protocols on Implants Mechanical and Biological Stability in Posterior Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (actual)
• Sponsor: Arab American University (Palestine) · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 19 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

A total of 80 implants were placed in the posterior region of the maxilla in 40 patients in a split-mouth design. Bone quality was classified into type I, II, III, IV, or V as assessed preoperatively on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) . Primary implant stability was measured with insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ values). Secondary stability was measured by ISQ at abutment installation.

Conditions

• Implant Therapy

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	osseodensification drilling	Implant mechanical and biological stability measured using ISQ values at the time of implant placement and at abutment connection for 40 implants placed in the posterior maxillary area using the osseodensification protocol.
PROCEDURE	conventional drilling	Implant mechanical and biological stability measured using ISQ values at the time of implant placement and at abutment connection for 40 implants placed in the posterior maxillary area using the conventional drilling protocol.

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-04-04
• Primary completion: 2022-06-01
• Completion: 2023-02-01
• First posted: 2023-04-24
• Last updated: 2023-04-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Palestinian Territories