Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05801328

Comparison Between Occlusal Versus Apical Bent Wires in Patients on Erich Arch Bar

Comparison Between Occlusal Versus Apical Bent Wires in Patients on Erich Arch Bar: A Prospective Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24 (estimated)
Sponsor
Universiti Sains Malaysia · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Patients with jaw fractures requires placement of Erich arch bar for immobilization of the fractured jaw. However, the usage of Erich arch bar is associated with an increased in the incidence of mucosal trauma and plaque accumulation. Conventionally, the ends of the wires has always been placed apical to the teeth. This study aims to determine if a change in the placement of the wire by directing it to the occlusal direction will reduce the incidence of mucosal trauma, plaque accumulation and if the stability of the Erich arch bar will be affected by this intervention. The patients' teeth will be divided into left and right side and randomized into control side (wires end apically) and interventional side (wires end occlusally)

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEEnding of the wires on Erich arch bar in the occlusal directionThe wires of the Erich arch bar will be placed on the occlusal direction

Timeline

Start date
2023-04-01
Primary completion
2024-04-01
Completion
2024-07-01
First posted
2023-04-06
Last updated
2023-04-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Malaysia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05801328. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.