Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Enrolling By Invitation

Enrolling By InvitationNCT05762055

Prospective Comparative Analysis of ACDF vs Fusion Interbody Cages With nanoLOCK Osseointegrative Technology

Prospective Comparative Analysis Evaluating Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Stand-Alone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Interbody Cages With nanoLOCK Osseointegrative Technology

Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Study team will plan a prospective, randomized control trial using our institution's spine clinical outcomes registry. Eligible patients undergoing ACDF (see inclusion criteria listed below) will be randomized to an Intervention or Control Group, which will differ according to the interbody cage used during the procedure. In the Intervention Group (100 patients), Medtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology will be implanted at each treated level. In the Control Group (100 patients), patients will receive an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology. Interbody cages used in the Control Group (along with the decision to apply anterior plate fixation) will be determined according to surgeon preference. There will be no blinding to the type of implant used. Standard demographic and procedural variables will be collected for all patients (including history of diabetes, tobacco, use, prior use of oral corticosteroids, number of levels fused, and presence of bicortical screw placement). Clinical and radiographic outcomes in the Intervention and Control Groups will be directly compared.

Detailed description

Aim 1: Examine the effect of nanoLOCK technology on rates of postoperative dysphagia after ACDF. Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of nanoLOCK technology on radiographic fusion. Aim 3: Evaluate how nanoLOCK technology influences the development of radiographic adjacent segment disease.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICETitan nanoLOCK interbody cageMedtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology
DEVICEACDF interbody cageAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology

Timeline

Start date
2024-02-05
Primary completion
2026-05-01
Completion
2026-05-01
First posted
2023-03-09
Last updated
2025-04-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05762055. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.