Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05754697

IASTM Versus PRT in Patients With Chronic PF

Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Positional Release Technique in Patients With Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Cairo University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
30 Years – 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial\] is to compare between the effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and positional release technique in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: 1. Is there a difference between the effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and positional release technique on pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis? 2. Is there a difference between the effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and positional release technique on foot function level in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis?

Detailed description

Design of the study: Pretest - posttest randomized controlled trial. Subjects selection: Sixty patients their age range from 30-50 years of both genders with chronic plantar fasciitis will participate in this study according to sample size calculation.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERInstrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in addition to traditional treatmentThe treatment protocol will be two sessions will be given per week for 4 weeks.
OTHERPositional release technique in addition to traditional treatmentThe treatment protocol will be two sessions will be given per week for 4 weeks.
OTHERTraditional treatmentThe treatment protocol will be two sessions will be given per week for 4 weeks.

Timeline

Start date
2023-03-15
Primary completion
2023-06-15
Completion
2023-07-30
First posted
2023-03-06
Last updated
2023-09-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05754697. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.