NCT05744726

Comparison of A-PRF vs Bone Wax in Hemostasis, Pain Relief and Healing Following Exodontia

Comparison of A-PRF vs Bone Wax in Hemostasis, Pain Relief and Healing Following Exodontia: A Single-blind Randomised Control Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 129 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 40 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the pain relief and healing effect of A-PRF and Bone-wax in patients having mandibular tooth-extractions. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: In the perspective of improvement in pain and healing; * Does A-PRF performs better than control group? * Does Bone-wax performs better than control group? * Healing index and Pain scale score Comparison of A-PRF and Bone-wax; if one is better than the other? Participants will be asked to give resoponse to a post-operative symptom severiety (PoSSe) scale. An investigator will score the patient's extraction for hemostasis and on healing index \[describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, treatments they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items\]. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare \[insert groups\] to see if \[insert effects\].

Conditions

• Post-Extraction Socket Hemostasis
• Post-Extraction Socket Pain Relief
• Post-Extraction Socket Healing

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
BIOLOGICAL	A-PRF	0.5 to 1g of Advance Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) clot for each dental socket.
COMBINATION_PRODUCT	Bone-wax	0.5 to 1g of Bone-wax for each dental socket

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-01-01
• Primary completion: 2023-06-30
• Completion: 2023-09-30
• First posted: 2023-02-27
• Last updated: 2023-02-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan