NCT05707936

Normal Saline Versus Heparin Intermittent Flushing for the Prevention of Occlusion in Port-a-Cath

Normal Saline Versus Heparin Intermittent Flushing for the Prevention of Occlusion in Port-a-Cath: Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 192 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Purpose: An evidence implementation of a randomized controlled trial for whether there is the difference in intermittent flushing 0.9% normal saline and heparin? Design: a single-blind randomized controlled trial Method: This study is based on the 5A (Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply, Audit) of evidence health care step, and design randomized controlled trial for evidence implementation. We will include inpatients over 20 years-old adults in New Taipei City TuCheng Hospital, Taiwan, who need administration medicine by port-a-catcher. The sample size is 192 according to G-power software. Random allocation software has using for block randomization, would assign to group A: flushing with 0.9% normal saline 10ml, group B: flushing with 0.9% normal saline 20ml, and group C: flushing with heparin 100 USP/ml. SPSS 20.0 software for statistical analysis, mean or standard deviation, one- way ANOVA would use.

Conditions

• Port-a-cath Occlusion
• Normal Saline
• Heparin Lock

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Normal Saline Flush 20 ml	Normal Saline Flush 20 ml
DRUG	Normal Saline Flush 10 ml	Normal Saline Flush 10 ml
DRUG	Heparin Flush (1000 USP, 10ml)	Heparin Flush (1000 USP, 10ml)

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-02-01
• Primary completion: 2023-09-01
• Completion: 2023-12-31
• First posted: 2023-02-01
• Last updated: 2023-02-01