NCT05695872

A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

The Best Approach to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures: A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 24 (actual)
• Sponsor: University of Alexandria · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 50 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The study is intended to compare between the subtarsal approach, conventional transconjuctival approach and the Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach in the management of zygomatico-maxillay complex fracture.

Detailed description

The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Twenty-four patients with age range of 20-50 years requiring open reduction and fixation of a fractured zygomatic complex were randomly divided into three equal groups according to the approach used: Group A: subtarsal approach group. Group B: conventional transconjuctival approach group. Group C: Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach group.

Conditions

• Zygomatic Fractures

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	subtarsal approach	surgical approach
PROCEDURE	conventional transconjunctival approach	surgical approach
PROCEDURE	transconjunctival approach with Y- modification	surgical approach

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-08-26
• Primary completion: 2023-02-01
• Completion: 2023-02-05
• First posted: 2023-01-25
• Last updated: 2023-05-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt