Trials / Active Not Recruiting
Active Not RecruitingNCT05615038
A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Multicentre, Prospective, Open-label, Blind Endpoint, Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Active Not Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 338 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Contact aspiration Thrombectomy | Contant aspiration is an approach that utilizes the advantages of large-bore aspiration catheters that can be easily tracked and introduced into the cerebral circulation to directly remove the thrombus via negative pressure aspiration. |
| PROCEDURE | Stent retriever thrombectomy | Stent retriever thrombetomy is an approach that utilize sself-expandable stent for thrombectomy. The stent retriever is expanded to capture the thrombus, which immediately may restore blood flow. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-11-07
- Primary completion
- 2025-02-21
- Completion
- 2025-06-30
- First posted
- 2022-11-14
- Last updated
- 2025-04-27
Locations
6 sites across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05615038. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.