NCT05609565

Intrathecal Prilocaine and Adductor Canal Block vs Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy

Hybrid Anesthesia for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy Using Intrathecal Prilocaine and Adductor Canal Block vs Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone: a Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 80 (actual)
• Sponsor: Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 21 Years – 60 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

\- Although bupivacaine is safe and has a low rate of transient neurologic symptoms, the prolonged sensory and motor block is a drawback for day-case spinal anesthesia.Intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine causes a much shorter motor block, with a similar onset time and lower inter-individual variability in motor block duration. Furthermore, the peripheral nerve block is used as an adjunct to the spinal anesthesia to prolong the surgical anesthetic conditions.

Conditions

• Post Operative Pain

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine+adductor canal block (ACB) with bupivacaine	spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine+adductor canal block (ACB) with bupivacaine
DRUG	spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine	spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-11-15
• Primary completion: 2024-09-30
• Completion: 2024-09-30
• First posted: 2022-11-08
• Last updated: 2024-11-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt