Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05607433

Air Q Laryngeal Airway Versus the AmbuAura Gain as a Conduit for Endotracheal Intubation

Air Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air QILA) Versus the AmbuAura Gain as a Conduit for Endotracheal Intubation Assisted by Tube Exchanger, a Randomized Comparative Study.

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44 (estimated)
Sponsor
Cairo University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The study aims to compare the efficacy of the Ambu AuraGain to that of the Air Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation assisted by tube exchanger. The comparison will be in terms of total intubation time, success rate of insertion of the tube exchanger as well as endotracheal intubation and complications.

Detailed description

Very few studies discussed assisted endotrachealc intubation using certain tools as bougie through the Air Q ILA . the hypothesis in this study is that the use of flexible, small calibre tube exchanger introduced through both supraglottic devices into the trachea as guidance for endotracheal intubation, will have shorter intubation time with the Ambu AuraGain than the Air Q ILA and less complications in both devices.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEcook ®Airway Exchanger CatheterA tube exchanger is a small calibre , flexible tube used to guide endotracheal intubation through a supraglottic device.

Timeline

Start date
2022-11-01
Primary completion
2022-12-01
Completion
2022-12-01
First posted
2022-11-07
Last updated
2022-11-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05607433. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.