Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05604625

Ethically Accepted With Code 851/2971 A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator Versus Andresen Activator

A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator Versus Andresen Activator: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24 (estimated)
Sponsor
Al-Azhar University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
8 Years – 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the treatment results when treating Class II division 1 malocclusion using the Van Beek-Headgear Activator combination (vBHGA) appliance versus using the Andresen activator.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEVan-Beek activator and a headgear12 patients will receive Van-Beek activator and a headgear
DEVICEAndresen activator12 patients will receive Andresen activator.

Timeline

Start date
2022-12-15
Primary completion
2023-04-15
Completion
2023-06-15
First posted
2022-11-03
Last updated
2022-11-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05604625. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Ethically Accepted With Code 851/2971 A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator V (NCT05604625) · Clinical Trials Directory