Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT05602636

Analgesic Effect of Supraclavicular Block and Interscalene Analgesia Versus an Intercostobrachial Nerve Block Versus PCA in Forearm Surgery

Efficacy of Combined US-Guided Supraclavicular Block and Interscalene Analgesia Versus an Intercostobrachial Nerve Block Versus PCA With Fentanyl on Preventing Tourniquet Pain in Forearm Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
Al-Azhar University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The etiology of tourniquet pain is complex, and the study team hypothesizes that blocking with Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) is more efficient in decreasing the incidence of tourniquet pain in comparison with other techniques. As there is a paucity of studies that evaluate the effect of intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) block and ISBPB and Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with a supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) on tourniquet pain in forearm surgery, Therefore, we established this randomized study to compare ISBPB and ICBN and PCA with fentanyl with SCBPB in terms of the incidence and severity of tourniquet pain in patients undergoing forearm surgery.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGbupivacaine, midazolamPatients will be provided with midazolam (up to 2 mg) if requested. No opioids will be administered before the incision. At the first patient complaint of pain, the intraoperative anesthesia team will document the quality and location of pain, and 50 microgram of fentanyl will be administered if the patient requested it or pain score more than 3

Timeline

Start date
2022-12-10
Primary completion
2025-12-30
Completion
2025-12-30
First posted
2022-11-02
Last updated
2026-01-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05602636. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.