Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05561816
Efficacy and Safety of Dioxidin Versus Miramistin in Superficial Pyoderma
Opened, Multicenter, Randomized, in Parallel Groups Comparative Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dioxidin®, Solution for Topical and External Application 0.025% (Valenta Farm, Russia) and Miramistin®, Solution for Topical Application 0.01% (Infamed K LLC, Russia) in Treatment of Superficial Pyoderma
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 240 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Valenta Pharm JSC · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The study is aimed to: * evaluate the effectiveness of 10-day therapy with Dioxidin® compared with Miramistin® in the treatment of superficial pyoderma, * evaluate the safety and tolerability of 10-day therapy with Dioxidin® compared with Miramistin® for the treatment of superficial pyoderma.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Hydroxymethylquinoxalindioxyde | Dioxidin®, 0.025% solution for local and external use (Valenta Farm, Russia). |
| DRUG | Benzyl-dimethyl-[3-(tetradecanoylamino)propyl]azanium | Miramistin®, topical solution 0.01% (Infamed K LLC, Russia) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-07-19
- Primary completion
- 2022-11-28
- Completion
- 2022-12-20
- First posted
- 2022-09-30
- Last updated
- 2023-10-10
Locations
10 sites across 1 country: Russia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05561816. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.