Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05551910

Comparison of Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Esmketamine and Remifentanil Combined With Propofol Respectively in Septic Shock Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120 (estimated)
Sponsor
The First Hospital of Jilin University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation who were randomly enrolled in ICU were divided into esketamine group (test group) and remifentanil group (control group) according to the ratio of 1:1. The dose of vasopressor, the time of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of intestinal dysfunction and the dose of propofol were compared between the two groups. Through statistical analysis, it was determined whether esketamine combined with propofol could improve the prognosis of septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation and reduce the adverse reactions of analgesic and sedative drugs compared with remifentanil combined with propofol.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether esketamine combined with propofol can improve the prognosis and reduce the adverse effects of analgesic and sedative drugs in septic shock patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation compared with remifentanil combined with propofol. Study methods: septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU were randomly divided into esketamine group (test group) and remifentanil group (control group) according to the ratio of 1:1. 120 patients are expected to be enrolled. The dose of vasopressor, the time of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of intestinal dysfunction and the dose of propofol were compared between the two groups. Through statistical analysis, it was determined whether esketamine combined with propofol could improve the prognosis of septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation and reduce the adverse reactions of analgesic and sedative drugs compared with remifentanil combined with propofol. From January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024, the clinical study of the patients (60 cases) enrolled in the first phase was completed as expected in the study protocol. Stage objective: to count the relevant detection indicators of the two groups of patients, analyze and compare whether there is a difference between the primary endpoint and the secondary observation endpoint, and write a research paper and a mid-term summary. From January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, the clinical study of patients (60 cases) enrolled in the second phase was completed according to the research protocol. Stage objective: to count the relevant detection indicators of the two groups of patients, analyze and compare whether there is a difference between the primary endpoint and the secondary observation endpoint, and write a research paper and a conclusion report. Publication form of research results: 1-2 academic papers published in domestic or international journals.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGEsketamineThe patients in the test group were given esmketamine (50mg / 2ml \* branch, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 0.15-0.5mg/kg H was pumped intravenously. Two minutes after the administration, the pain was scored with the cpot pain observation scale. The target cpot was \< 3 points. The dose of esketamine was adjusted according to the cpot score.
DRUGRemifentanilPatients in the control group were given remifentanil (1mg / branch, Yichang humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 0.05-2ug/kg Minutes after administration, the analgesic score was measured with cpot pain observation scale. The target cpot was less than 3 points, and the dose of remifentanil was adjusted according to the cpot score.
DRUGpropofolpropofol

Timeline

Start date
2023-01-01
Primary completion
2025-01-01
Completion
2025-03-01
First posted
2022-09-23
Last updated
2022-09-23

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05551910. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.