Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05549856
Comparision of EUS-FNB Techniques for Diagnose of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Official Title: Dry Suction Technique Versus Wet Suction Technique of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Studies have shown that the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNA generates better histological diagnostic accuracy and specimen quality than the dry-suction technique. However, studies on wet suction on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB is small and the conclusions are controversial. Besides, the optional numeber of passes for EUS-FNB has not been determined.
Detailed description
The investigators aimed to design a large multicenter randomized trial to compare the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal number of passes required for EUS-FNB in solid pancreatic lesions using 22G Franseen under wet aspiration versus standard aspiration.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Wet suction | The pancreatic solid lesions will be puncture with the 22G Acquire needle (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA). Before puncturing the lesion, flush the needle with 5ml saline, then use a 10 ml syringe in order to replacing the column of air with fluid. After puncture, monitoring the puncture needle under US guidance in real time, the needle was moved back and forth about 10-20 times within the lesion using a fanning technique. |
| PROCEDURE | Dry suction | The pancreatic solid lesions will be puncture with the 22G Acquire needle (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA). The stylet is removed and a 10 ml air-filled pre-vacuum syringe is attached. After puncture, monitoring the puncture needle under US guidance in real time, the needle was moved back and forth about 10-20 times within the lesion using a fanning technique. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-12-01
- Completion
- 2025-02-01
- First posted
- 2022-09-22
- Last updated
- 2022-09-23
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05549856. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.