Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05538715
Reconstruction of Localized Alveolar Ridge Defects
Comperative Clinical, Microcircular, Surface Scanning, Radiological and Histological Evaluation of Two Different Flap Techniques - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial/
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 44 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Semmelweis University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The aim of the present prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the clinical, radiological, micro-circulation, and histology of a novel, semi-thick, and conventional full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap technique during horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation.
Detailed description
The aim of our study was to compare the clinical, radiological, circulatory, and histological studies of a novel, split-thickness and conventional full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap technique during horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation surgeries. Flap formation was performed in the test group using the novel split-thickness surgical technique, and in the control group using the full-thickness mucoperostatial surgical technique. The novel split-thickness flap technique to be studied results in a predictable, closed healing based on our preliminary results, thus ensuring the conditions for successful augmentation. We primarily want to investigate what hard and soft tissue changes result from ridge augmentation with a novel split-thickness flap technique after 6 months, compared to a surgical technique based on full thick flap formation accepted as a standard procedure in the literature. Our secondary examination methods: examination of early wound healing and micro-circulation after augmentation interventions by LSCI method; histological evaluation at prosthetically designed implant positions.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Split-thickness group | Following randomization, horizontal guided bone regeneration utilizing Bio-Oss (Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and autogenous bone in combination with Bio-Gide membrane (Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland). Surgery is performed with a split-thickness flap design in the posterior maxilla or mandible in partially edentolous patients. |
| PROCEDURE | Full-thickness group | Following randomization, horizontal guided bone regeneration utilizing Bio-Oss (Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and autogenous bone in combination with Bio-Gide membrane (Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland). Surgery is performed with a full-thickness flap design in the posterior maxilla or mandible in partially edentolous patients. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-11-08
- Primary completion
- 2024-09-30
- Completion
- 2024-09-30
- First posted
- 2022-09-14
- Last updated
- 2023-11-27
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Hungary
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05538715. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.