Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05536323
Bolus Versus Continuous Remimazolam for Anesthetic Induction
Comparison of the Incidence of Hypotension in Bolus Versus Continuous Administration of Remimazolam During Anesthesia Induction
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 62 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Kangbuk Samsung Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Remimazolam is a newly introduced intravenous anesthetic, with rapid onset and offset. Although it is known to cause less hemodynamic instability, the incidence hypotension is the one of the most frequent adverse events with its use. For anesthetic induction, remimazolam can be used either as bolus dose or as continuous infusion. This study is aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension after anesthetic induction with bolus (0.14-0.33 mg/kg) or continuous (12 mg/kg/hr) remimazolam administration.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Remimazolam bolus | Remimazolam bolus 0.14-0.33 mg/kg 0.25-0.33 mg/kg, \<40 years 0.19-0.25 mg/kg, 60-80 years 0.14-0.19 mg/kg, \>80 years |
| DRUG | Remimazolam continuous | Remimazolam 12 mg/kg/hr |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-11-01
- Completion
- 2023-12-01
- First posted
- 2022-09-10
- Last updated
- 2023-06-02
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05536323. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.