Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05535647
Second Line Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Second Line Therapy With Regorafenib and HAIC Compared to FOLFOX for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a prospective, Two-arm, comparative, randomized, controlled phase II trial, to explore the efficacy and safety of Regorafenib and HAIC vs. FOLFOX as Second Line Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Detailed description
Currently, complete surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment option for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, including intrahepatic, hilar and distal CCA) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA). However,only less than 25% of patients are resectable at diagnosis and, even in this subset of patients, relapse rate is high. Cisplatin and gemcitabine combination was identified as the standard first-line chemotherapy, yielding a median progression free survival (PFS) and median OS of 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. FOLFOX was the standard second-line chemotherapy. But the benefit of FOLFOX was limited.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Regorafenib and HAIC | Regorafenib: oral 80mg/day, D1-21, Q28d; HAIC with FOLFOX: hepatic artery infusion Oxa 85 mg/m2, CF 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 2400mg/m2 infusion 48h. |
| DRUG | FOLFOX | Oxa 85 mg/m2, CF 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 2400mg/m2 infusion 48h. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-09-25
- Primary completion
- 2024-09-25
- Completion
- 2025-09-25
- First posted
- 2022-09-10
- Last updated
- 2022-09-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05535647. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.