NCT05529329

Zirconia Versus Lithium Di-silicate Overlays for Restoring Hypomineralized Molars Affected With MIH

Clinical Outcome of Zirconia Versus Lithium Di-silicate Overlays Restorations for Restoring Vital Young Permanent First Molar Teeth Affected With Moderate Form of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization: Randomized Clinical Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 52 (actual)
• Sponsor: Al-Azhar University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 7 Years – 12 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

the study evaluate the clinical outcome of zirconia versus lithium disilicate overlays restorations for restoring vital young permanent first molar teeth affected with moderate form of molar Incisor hypomineralization: randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

To compare the one-year clinical outcome of zirconia versus lithium disilicate overlays restorations. Materials and methods: Twenty patients were distributed into two groups in relation to the material used for the fabrication of overlays restorations; group (Z) (n=10): patients received zirconia restorations, group (EC): patients received IPS E.max Cad restorations. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of these restorations were carried out at base line (1 week), 3, 6 and 12 months after cementation using FDI World Dental Federation criteria

Conditions

• Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	overlay	Lithium Disilicate partial coverage of hypo-mineralized defected enamel

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-04-01
• Primary completion: 2022-04-01
• Completion: 2022-08-20
• First posted: 2022-09-07
• Last updated: 2023-02-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt