Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05512455
Accuracy of Various Virtual Articulator Mounting Procedures: An in Vivo Study
Comparison of the Precision of the Virtual Articulators Using Various Virtual Articulator Mounting Procedures
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 20 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Fujian Medical University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 30 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
the aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the various virtual articulator mounting procedures.
Detailed description
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of various virtual articulator mounting procedures. For this purpose, 7 kinds of virtual mounting procedures were investigated:(1) indirect virtual mounting in MS VA by using an average facebow; (2) virtual mounting in MS VA by using average values; (3) virtual mounting in MS VA by using professional facial scanner; (4) virtual mounting in MS VA by using smartphone facial scanner; (5) virtual mounting in MS VA by using CBCT located in Bergstrom's point; (6) virtual mounting in MS VA by using CBCT located in the medial poles of the condyles; (7) virtual mounting in CA VA by using JMA,as the group to compare with the other mounting procedures. The null hypothesis is that no difference would be found in the static measurements taken virtually when comparing these 7 procedures for virtual mounting.
Conditions
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2022-08-15
- Completion
- 2022-08-20
- First posted
- 2022-08-23
- Last updated
- 2022-08-23
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05512455. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.